The Hidden Cost of Poor Records

Poor record keeping increases disputes, wasted time, and compliance risk for strata organisations across Australia. Here’s why better systems matter.

By Rohith PoyyeriBLOGSCreated at: 1/16/2026
The Hidden Cost of Poor Records

Most buildings underestimate how much poor record keeping actually costs them.

It doesn’t show up as a single big expense on a balance sheet. Instead, it leaks out slowly — in wasted time, repeated work, unresolved disputes, frustrated owners, and unnecessary risk.

You see it when someone spends 20 minutes searching for an old email. When a contractor is re-quoted because the original paperwork can’t be found. When a new committee questions a decision and nobody can explain why it was made.

These small inefficiencies compound over time.

When information lives everywhere — it lives nowhere

In many strata organisations, information is scattered across:

  • Email inboxes

  • Personal laptops

  • Shared drives

  • Messaging apps

  • Paper folders

  • Old committee members’ devices

There is no single source of truth. Everyone has part of the story, but nobody has the full picture.

This creates confusion, delays, and risk — especially when staff or committee members change.

The compliance and legal impact

In Australia, strata legislation requires accurate and accessible records. In disputes or audits, organisations must demonstrate:

  • How decisions were made

  • Who approved them

  • What evidence supported them

  • When actions occurred

If records are incomplete or inconsistent, the organisation is exposed. Even if the decision itself was reasonable, the inability to prove it creates unnecessary risk.

The productivity drain nobody measures

Manual record searching costs real time. Multiply that across multiple staff, multiple properties, and multiple years — and the cost becomes significant.

Teams also end up recreating work because history isn’t visible. The same mistakes get repeated. The same vendors are re-evaluated from scratch. The same discussions happen again and again.

Better records create leverage. Knowledge compounds instead of disappearing.

How good systems change everything

Strong systems centralise information where the work happens. Documents, approvals, conversations, and timelines live together.

This creates:

  • Faster decision making

  • Better onboarding for new staff and committee members

  • Reduced compliance risk

  • Stronger accountability

  • Less operational stress

Final thought

Poor records don’t just create inconvenience — they quietly increase risk and waste across your entire operation.

Investing in better systems isn’t about technology. It’s about protecting time, trust, and long-term sustainability.

👉 Protect your committee with structured governance:
https://propordo.com/demo

record keepingstrata complianceproperty riskgovernance systemsproperty management australia

Suggestions

Future of Property Management in Australia

Future of Property Management in Australia

Future of Property Management in Australia. Explore how technology, automation, and AI are shaping the future of property management across Australia.

Read More →
From Chaos to Clarity in Property Operations

From Chaos to Clarity in Property Operations

Disconnected tools create chaos in property operations. Learn how unified platforms deliver clarity, speed, and accountability.

Read More →
Reducing Risk in Strata Decision Making

Reducing Risk in Strata Decision Making

Poor visibility and informal approvals increase risk in strata operations. Learn how structured workflows reduce exposure and disputes.

Read More →
How Digital Records Protect Committees

How Digital Records Protect Committees

Accurate digital records protect strata committees from disputes, compliance risk, and lost knowledge. Learn why record-keeping matters.

Read More →
Scaling Without Losing Control

Scaling Without Losing Control

Learn how property teams can scale operations while maintaining governance, quality, and visibility using modern systems.

Read More →